• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: DVD problems, was: Early thoughts on 10.1
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DVD problems, was: Early thoughts on 10.1


  • Subject: Re: DVD problems, was: Early thoughts on 10.1
  • From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 18:32:30 +0100

On Monday, October 1, 2001, at 05:36 PM, R. Tony Goold wrote:

The encryption method was NOT reverse engineered through a legal black box
method.

In the early days of DeCSS talk, I came across a web page containing exactly such an analysis of CSS, pointing out its theoretical weaknesses. If I can find it again, I'll post it.

Well, still, the encryption was reverse engineered illegally.

Black box/closed room reverse engineering is fine and in
most cases completely legal.

Except under the DMCA, which effectively suppresses scientists who want to publish their findings...

The DMCA only applies in the USA (they're introducing a similar one here in the UK soon, though), so it will still be legal in more liberal countries like the Netherlands (I think).

-- Finlay


References: 
 >Re: DVD problems, was: Early thoughts on 10.1 (From: "R. Tony Goold" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: __MyCompanyName__
  • Next by Date: RE: NSScrollView and general IB annoyance
  • Previous by thread: Re: DVD problems, was: Early thoughts on 10.1
  • Next by thread: Re: Dare I fear the 10.1 upgrade?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread