• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Cocoa Java vs Swing Java classes
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cocoa Java vs Swing Java classes


  • Subject: Re: Cocoa Java vs Swing Java classes
  • From: Chris Hanson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 17:25:37 -0500

At 9:54 AM +0100 10/14/01, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
As someone else pointed out when you use Cocoa Java you lose portability, but then you can probably keep all your model and backend for your application and just rewrite the UI layer. It's up to you, though.

The advantage to Cocoa Java is that you can *easily* re-use Java code from other projects while building an application very quickly that fully implements the Mac OS X look and feel. For some people, this isn't a big deal. For others it may be. Some people are content to write Objective-C that calls Java through the bridge, others aren't.

This advantage extends to database applications right now too, since EOF 5 is only available as a Java framework (and only as part of WebObjects). Also, when building WebObjects applications using Cocoa Java Client could be a significant value-add for things like administration tools if you know users are going to be running Mac OS X.

-- Chris


References: 
 >Re: Cocoa Java vs Swing Java classes (From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Dragging from Finder into View
  • Next by Date: getting path info from PDF image?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Cocoa Java vs Swing Java classes
  • Next by thread: Re: Cocoa Java vs Swing Java classes
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread