• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Beginner's questions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Beginner's questions


  • Subject: Re: Beginner's questions
  • From: "John C. Randolph" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 07:28:16 -0700

On Tuesday, October 16, 2001, at 06:30 AM, Georg Tuparev wrote:

Well, speaking about packages, this is one of the very few things I would like to see in ObjC. But speaking about Java packages, they are useless IMHO, because of the lack of support for versions. I remember when the Java was still in stage of white papers and pre-alpha releases, I asked Mr. James Gosling why the packages does not support versions. He told me that if you carefully design your interface you will never change it (only extend it), and therefor you do not need packages (at that time they had no depreciation switch for javac ;-) I told him he is naive. He never replayed. I still think he is naive...

The man has fallen into the popularity trap: he's convinced that because Java is so popular, it's good. Try talking to him about categories sometime.

-jcr


"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve." -Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, Dec 7, 1941.


References: 
 >Re: Beginner's questions (From: Georg Tuparev <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Linker Errors when using std::string
  • Next by Date: interapplication communication
  • Previous by thread: Re: Beginner's questions
  • Next by thread: Re: Beginner's questions
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread