Re: Another controversial question
Re: Another controversial question
- Subject: Re: Another controversial question
- From: Richard Adams <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 11:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
on 9/3/01 12:56 PM, Ondra Cada at email@hidden wrote:
>
Please take no offence, but I am starting to be
_really sickened_ by all of
>
you who are lazy enough to read, blaming Apple for a
bad docs. True is that
>
*SOME* things are documented really badly; though,
for I guess fifty rants of
>
"bad docs" here, some 49 is of things which are,
instead, documented quite
>
well. Like:
>
>
===
>
/System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Resources/English.lproj/Docume
>
ntation/Reference/ObjC_classic/Protocols/NSKeyValueCoding.html
>
===
Part of the problem is simple learning our way around
the documentation.
Maybe I'm just spoiled, but who'd have figured that
this document was 11 "/"'s deep. Geez this stuff is
confusing to the uninitiated.
*** Rich ***
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com