• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Any advantages of Unix formatting
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Any advantages of Unix formatting


  • Subject: Re: Any advantages of Unix formatting
  • From: Andreas Monitzer <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 03:15:47 +0200

On Tuesday, September 4, 2001, at 02:49 , Chris Gehlker wrote:

On 9/3/01 5:04 PM, "Andreas Monitzer" <email@hidden> wrote:

UFS is actually slower than HFS+ on Darwin/Mac OS X, probably because
Apple didn't optimize the driver that much.

Well maybe but UFS is also a clunky old file system that doesn't even use an
extents tree. HFS+ is comparatively much more modern.

But HFS+ is much more fragile. Some structural problems can't be fixed except by reformatting or risking the loss of all data. If you do a fsck on an UFS-device, it's like new (except the data is still there :) afterwards, even if it was severely damaged (I already had that experience)
.

Of course, B-tree searching is much faster, but Sherlock - the only interface to it on Mac OS X - is unusable anyways.

andy
--
Description forthcoming.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Any advantages of Unix formatting
      • From: SATO Seichi <email@hidden>
    • Re: Any advantages of Unix formatting
      • From: Chris Gehlker <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Any advantages of Unix formatting (From: Chris Gehlker <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Any advantages of Unix formatting
  • Next by Date: Re: Implementing behavior for "make" appleevent in Cocoa App
  • Previous by thread: Re: Any advantages of Unix formatting
  • Next by thread: Re: Any advantages of Unix formatting
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread