• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: ObjC API != Cocoa (Re: Another controversial question)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ObjC API != Cocoa (Re: Another controversial question)


  • Subject: Re: ObjC API != Cocoa (Re: Another controversial question)
  • From: Jonathan Hendry <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:50:48 -0500

On Tuesday, September 4, 2001, at 11:32 , Ondra Cada wrote:

Jonathan,

Jonathan Hendry (JH) wrote at Tue, 4 Sep 2001 10:21:26 -0500:
JH> >"Since a properly done ObjC-based API is *MUCH* better than a non-OO
JH> >one, it
JH> >is quite sad to see new non-OO APIs in Mac OS X:
JH>
JH> Ondra, you cannot say whether an API is much better or not without
JH> taking into account the requirements it has to meet.

Requirements? To be used in quickly developed, as bug-free as possible,
easily maintainable and upgradeable code. I kind of presumed that obvious.

No, Ondra, that's what you want. There are other requirements. That
you don't care for them doesn't not mean Apple is free to dismiss
them so casually.


  • Prev by Date: QT / Cocoa (was Re: Another controversial question)
  • Next by Date: Re: Any advantages of Unix formatting
  • Previous by thread: Re: ObjC API != Cocoa (Re: Another controversial question)
  • Next by thread: Re: ObjC API != Cocoa (Re: Another controversial question)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread