• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: ObjC API != Cocoa (Re: Another controversial question)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ObjC API != Cocoa (Re: Another controversial question)


  • Subject: Re: ObjC API != Cocoa (Re: Another controversial question)
  • From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 18:32:59 +0100

On Tuesday, September 4, 2001, at 09:09 am, Ondra Cada wrote:

(ii) BSD/posix and Carbon are compatibility Mac OS X APIs. They are C/C++
based, and offer subsets of the OS functionality needed to maintain the
aforementioned compatibility with Mac OS 9- (Carbon) or unix (BSD/posix)
sources. If something over that is needed, Cocoa API can be used.

Wrong. BSD/posix is the really native API of Mac OS X if you look at things one way, and Carbon is the really native API if you look at it the other way. It's all really rather subjective.

-- Finlay


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: ObjC API != Cocoa [long, subjective]
      • From: Brent Gulanowski <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: Any advantages of Unix formatting
  • Next by Date: RE: Any advantages of Unix formatting
  • Previous by thread: Re: ObjC API != Cocoa (Re: Another controversial question)
  • Next by thread: Re: ObjC API != Cocoa [long, subjective]
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread