• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: UMLish modellers?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: UMLish modellers?


  • Subject: Re: UMLish modellers?
  • From: Georg Tuparev <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 14:18:46 +0200

Simon,

Just out of curiosity... do you observe any performance or quality increase by using Rose ar any other tool? For many years I'm collecting data on various methodologies (e.g. RUP, XP,..) & design technics, and so far I never had any statistically significant proof that tools like Rose have any positive influence over the software development process. Though I have seen many occasions that they were hurting ... Do not get me wrong, I do design, but always just small bits, and always using A6 cards and pencil.

gt

On Wednesday, September 5, 2001, at 11:36 AM, Simon Stapleton wrote:

So, I'm used to using OOA/D tools (Rose mainly) at work, and I got to
wondering if there was anything out there that acknowledged the
existence of Obj-C (specifically something that would generate Obj-C
skeleton code and import existing code definitions).

Georg Tuparev
Tuparev Technologies
Klipper 13
1186 VR Amstelveen
The Netherlands
Mobile: +31-6-55798196


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: UMLish modellers?
      • From: "Erik M. Buck" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >UMLish modellers? (From: Simon Stapleton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: CoreFoundation: What is the prototype of the CFComparatorFunction?
  • Next by Date: Re: Mac OS X 10.1 File Name Extension Guidelines
  • Previous by thread: UMLish modellers?
  • Next by thread: Re: UMLish modellers?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread