• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: UMLish modellers?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: UMLish modellers?

  • Subject: Re: UMLish modellers?
  • From: "Marco Scheurer" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 19:15:37 +0200
> Yet I still find the lack of higher-level
> solutions, like UML, that do support/encourage change
> to be deeply discouraging.

What makes UML a better or higher level language than
Smalltalk for instance?

> it SHOULD be possible to build a UML editor (with
> hand-coded annotations) that supports deep refactoring

The Smalltalk refactoring browser in some cases requires
runtime analysis of the program to be refactored. Wouldn't
this be very difficult to do with generated code?


Marco Scheurer
Sen:te, Lausanne, Switzerland http://www.sente.ch

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: UMLish modellers?
      • From: Brad Cox <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: UMLish modellers? (From: Brad Cox <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: UMLish modellers?
  • Next by Date: Re: Would Any Developers Use This?
  • Previous by thread: Re: UMLish modellers?
  • Next by thread: Re: UMLish modellers?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread