• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: opposite of OOP (was file extensions)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: opposite of OOP (was file extensions)


  • Subject: Re: opposite of OOP (was file extensions)
  • From: Brent Gulanowski <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 19:04:11 -0400

> Incidentally, correct me please if I am wrong, but unless there was some
> re-definition of terms lately, I guess we *are* working procedurally in ObjC
> with objects. So far as I know, "procedural" programming is an antonyme to
> "declarative" programming (like in Prolog, or, rather, like what Prolog was
> designed for but did not quite fulfilled ;)), and has nothing to do with
> objects or lack of them at all.
> ---
> Ondra Cada

OK, since I'm too lazy to look it up, what _is_ the opposite of OOP?
Functional? Please don't say something like non-OOP... ;) But you can tell
me to RTFM if you can find me a good M. Or does OOP not have an opposite
except declarative, being actually a special kind of procedural? Maybe I'll
learn at school: I started my OOP class today--slooow start. We're doing
Smalltalk along with the C++ tho, so that's good.



bg


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: opposite of OOP (was file extensions)
      • From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Mac OS X 10.1 File Name Extension Guidelines (From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: FW: Mac OS X 10.1 File Name Extensions -- chuck em!
  • Next by Date: Re: Mac OS X 10.1 File Name Extension Guidelines
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mac OS X 10.1 File Name Extension Guidelines
  • Next by thread: Re: opposite of OOP (was file extensions)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread