• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: opposite of OOP (was file extensions)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: opposite of OOP (was file extensions)


  • Subject: Re: opposite of OOP (was file extensions)
  • From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 13:28:22 +0200

Marco,

>>>>>> Marco Scheurer (MS) wrote at Wed, 12 Sep 2001 12:49:03 +0200:
MS> I believe that what makes OOP languages different from
MS> others is the message: sending a message, using
MS> polymorphism, is different from a procedure call.

I would agree -- it is my widely known opinion that eg. C++ is not an OO
language ;)

The majority though seems to "think differently" (sorry, could not resist ;))).
---
Ondra Cada
OCSoftware: email@hidden http://www.ocs.cz
private email@hidden http://www.ocs.cz/oc


References: 
 >Re: opposite of OOP (was file extensions) (From: "Marco Scheurer" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: A category for NSMatrix?
  • Next by Date: Re: *That* book
  • Previous by thread: Re: opposite of OOP (was file extensions)
  • Next by thread: Re: Mac OS X 10.1 File Name Extension Guidelines
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread