• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Mac OS X 10.1 File Name Extension Guidelines
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mac OS X 10.1 File Name Extension Guidelines


  • Subject: Re: Mac OS X 10.1 File Name Extension Guidelines
  • From: "Neal A. Crocker" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 22:32:24 -0700

On Monday, September 10, 2001, at 03:10 AM, Neal A. Crocker wrote:

In the Mac OS user experience, the average user never has to change the code, or even see it, so they never have to remember it.

I absolutely cannot confirm this.

Many of the more technically inclined Mac users I know have downloaded and used FileTyper sooner or later because they were sick and tired of other people's documents not opening in their own preferred application.

The less technically inclined users of course ususally do not understand FileTyper and the whole concept of type and creator code, so the more technically inclined users often tend to create auto typers for them (onto which they can drag and drop files to change type and creator code).

With kind regards

Piers Uso Walter <email@hidden>
ilink Kommunikationssysteme GmbH


It would seem to me that we are talking about different things. Certainly many Mac users feel the *effects* of type and creator codes and find useful utilities for changing them, but I would argue that such utilities never actually need to *show* the four bytes composing the type or creator code to the user (and, thus the user never needs to see them). With regards to creator codes, there is a one-to-one relationship between applications and creator codes (with the exception of irregular applications like applescript droplets and applets). It would seem to me that any well designed creator-code changing utility could present such changes in terms of changing the *owning application* or *default application* without ever show the actual four (possibly unprintable) bytes that compose creator codes. With regards to type codes, I'm fairly sure that the mechanisms used by Finder (specific resources in OS < 9 ("kind" ?, or maybe "BNDL"?) and info.plist files in OS X) can be used by type changing utilities to show users human readable "kind" strings (like those show in Finder folder list views) as optional settings for the files. Other resources may exist, such as Internet Config, the provide type changing utilities the information they need to present human readable options for types to the user. It seems that the actual four bytes of the type code could be hidden from all but the most advanced users of type changing utilities.

Neal.


  • Prev by Date: Re: Constrained Window Resizing
  • Next by Date: progress bar
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mac OS X 10.1 File Name Extension Guidelines
  • Next by thread: Sound documentation (Re: Search for "playscore" (NeXT) to play ".score" files in OS X)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread