RE: Naming conventions
RE: Naming conventions
- Subject: RE: Naming conventions
- From: "Smith, Bradley" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:17:24 +0100
I agree scoping is useful but I've found that people don't use it as well as
they should.
We had a class interface (in C++) called ISynchronize. Everything working
swimmingly with MS VC++ version 5. We upgraded to V6 and all our code broke
because MS introduced their own interface called ISynchronize and didn't
bother to put it in a namespace. So, did we put our stuff in a namespace?
No. We adopted a naming scheme for our own stuff and renamed ISynchronize to
something else (can't remember what we called it). It's interesting that we
(C++ programmers) had the facility that's being asked for here but actually
ended up using the Obj-C workaround. Well, I think it's interesting anyway.
Brad
Ondra said: -
>
Nope. Some scoping would be definitely great.