• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Is there a decent Obj-C for Windows?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is there a decent Obj-C for Windows?


  • Subject: Re: Is there a decent Obj-C for Windows?
  • From: Robert S Goldsmith <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 16:51:15 +0100

Hi :)


Basically, graphics in objectiveC are built on display postscript so you would need a dps renderer for windows - or a conversion lib.


Ahem. I think you meant to say 'graphics in current and past implementations of AppKit'.

I thought I had made that clear later in the email.


Granted, if you wanted to, let's say, _just compile_ GNUStep's AppKit implementation for Windows, you would either need to run a dps renderer or conversion lib for it to be useful.

GNUstep uses gps or, if you have dps - like on solaris - it can use that instead. I don't know of a dps renderer for windows. Taken that dps itself is (or was at least) coryright Adobe someone would have to port gps instead of dps.

Anyroadup. I'd suggest trying the GNUStep foundation replacement at least - it's reckoned to be solid enough for everyday use.

I've used it a bit on Solaris and, yes, it seems solid enough for me :) DO works well as well but, as i also mentioned, it does need an object server.



Really, unless it is natively supported (ie. Nextstep, openstep or os X), the Foundation and Appkit frameworks are much less useful or should only be used if you are willing to run the extra apps that work with the frameworks to get everything working. Certianly not good for writing apps for the pc unless you are willing to force people to install all these apps ...


Of course, you could always install those apps without telling the user, and have them always running in the background without the user knowing.

It's not quite that simple because they would most likely need configuration of some sort - esp. the distributed object server which, unless configured, broadcasts its presence to the entire local network ...

Some cynics might claim this is 'bad practice', 'dangerous' or 'an enormous security hole' but if it's good enough for Microsoft's standard OS installs it's good enough for me ;-)

:) Two wrongs do not make a right, they make a bigger mess. However, if we are talknig pc's then anything that brings down microsoft and intel is ok by me <g>

Robert


References: 
 >Re: Is there a decent Obj-C for Windows? (From: Simon Stapleton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Loading a nib window and making it key
  • Next by Date: SEL's
  • Previous by thread: Re: Is there a decent Obj-C for Windows?
  • Next by thread: Re: Is there a decent Obj-C for Windows?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread