• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: UMLish modellers?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: UMLish modellers?


  • Subject: Re: UMLish modellers?
  • From: Georg Tuparev <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 01:15:57 +0200

Sorry for the very late replays... I spend the last two weeks in real vacation in France and deliberately had no email connection ;-)

On Sunday, September 9, 2001, at 02:20 AM, Andreas Monitzer wrote:

We had to write a specification for our one-year-project (hardware/software combined). The teachers required us to specify EVERYTHING, for instance the temperatures our device will work with. That meant we had to know what components we'll use (what ICs, what capacitances etc). Which lead to designing the whole system beforehand (in two weeks).
There's no difference to software design, it's just not as obvious.

There is a big difference. It is "soft", and this softness is related mostly to the changing requirements...

Georg Tuparev
Tuparev Technologies
Klipper 13
1186 VR Amstelveen
The Netherlands
Mobile: +31-6-55798196


References: 
 >Re: UMLish modellers? (From: Andreas Monitzer <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: 10.1 Changes
  • Next by Date: Re: 10.1 Changes
  • Previous by thread: Re: UMLish modellers?
  • Next by thread: Re: UMLish modellers?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread