Re: enough of accessors - how about private method naming conventions in the real world?
Re: enough of accessors - how about private method naming conventions in the real world?
- Subject: Re: enough of accessors - how about private method naming conventions in the real world?
- From: Hasan Diwan <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 01:51:08 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Prefix method names as follows:
netHasandiwanFooDoesBarBaz
hasandiwan.net is a domain registered to me, foo is my class name and
what it does.
On Wednesday, August 7, 2002, at 01:48 AM, Michael B. Johnson wrote:
So what do *you* do when you want to have private methods in classes
that you want to have the same freedom with (i.e. the clients of these
classes, even if they have access to the source, don't want to be able
to accidentally override your private methods).
Hasan Diwan
OpenPGP KeyID: 0xBE42DCA6
Fingerprint: 1CB0 47E3 0A24 DAC1 DCCA 4225 F166 40C2 BE42 DCA6
http://hasandiwan.net/~hdiwan/gpg.key
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (Darwin)
iD8DBQE9UIwy8WZAwr5C3KYRApcvAJ9qujnoQymA8HeFambY+TpHWxELDQCdGhTD
1z68sMQFkXbiuyG4PZoTCms=
=foKm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.