Re: performSelector:withObject:afterDelay: question
Re: performSelector:withObject:afterDelay: question
- Subject: Re: performSelector:withObject:afterDelay: question
- From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 17:59:12 +0200
On Friday, August 9, 2002, at 05:35 , Mike Laster wrote:
Are sequential performSelector:withObject:afterDelay: scheduled performs
guaranteed to be performed in the same order? The documentation doesn't
say
one way or the other.
Therefore they are not.
I believe they actually do work that way currently (mainly since they, so
far as I know, are stored with an absolute time computed as "now+delay",
and of course "now" for subsequent messages differ), but you can't depend
on this behaviour.
---
Ondra Hada
OCSoftware: email@hidden
http://www.ocs.cz
private email@hidden
http://www.ocs.cz/oc
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.