• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: CVS versus OSX cvswrappers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CVS versus OSX cvswrappers


  • Subject: Re: CVS versus OSX cvswrappers
  • From: Jim Correia <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 18:52:13 -0500

On Monday, December 30, 2002, at 02:54 PM, Mark Dalrymple wrote:

The current Project Builder and Interface Builder respect the CVS directory
in the .nib and .pbproj files, so the principal reason for wrapping up
everything in tarfiles has been fixed.

What do you do if you have to put a different kind of document bundle under CVS control whose editor eats the CVS directories in the bundle?

.rtfd files have this problem.

FileStorm projects (which appear to use the built in Cocoa document bundle support?) have this problem.

I've read about the sordid history of the -f -t wrappers support, and would like to stop using them for better interoperability with newer versions of CVS. But for now, and for better or worse, them seem to continue to solve real world problems.

Jim
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: CVS versus OSX cvswrappers (From: Mark Dalrymple <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Custom sheets without going application modal?
  • Next by Date: the best way to implement a document based app that also manages documents?
  • Previous by thread: Re: CVS versus OSX cvswrappers
  • Next by thread: dockling
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread