• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Speed of Quartz (was: optimizing compilers)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Speed of Quartz (was: optimizing compilers)


  • Subject: Re: Speed of Quartz (was: optimizing compilers)
  • From: email@hidden
  • Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 23:54:31 -0500

On Monday, February 4, 2002, at 11:09 PM, email@hidden wrote:

i just did a comparison to x11 running on the same hardware... x11 fills 6.7 million pixels a second drawing 100 pixel long lines, no anti-aliasing, no alpha... so around 8X faster than quartz in the same mode. (note 500 pixel lines in x11 are filled at an astounding 32 million pixels per second!)

Just out of curiousity, when you are running this test "on the same hardware", are you running X11 under Linux or are you using XFree86 4.2 for Darwin?? (and if so, are you doing it rootless, or rooted).

email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Speed of Quartz (was: optimizing compilers)
      • From: email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: Speed of Quartz (was: optimizing compilers) (From: email@hidden)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Microseconds and Carbon
  • Next by Date: IB trashed my Nibs!
  • Previous by thread: Re: Speed of Quartz (was: optimizing compilers)
  • Next by thread: Re: Speed of Quartz (was: optimizing compilers)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread