Re: Memory Mania Revisted
Re: Memory Mania Revisted
- Subject: Re: Memory Mania Revisted
- From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 12:40:05 +0100
Andreas,
>
>>>>> Andreas Monitzer (AM) wrote at Sun, 10 Feb 2002 03:50:20 +0100:
AM> >And as for the practice, would you kindly point out a few standard
AM> >Foundation or AppKit classes which use new (or some variant of
AM> >newWith...) as
AM> >part of their standard API?
AM>
AM> NSJavaVirtualMachine.h, part of JavaVM.framework:
"standard Foundation or AppKit classes"!
Though partially I stand corrected: it indeed seems that outside of OpenStep
+new still lives: that I haven't known.
Therefore I guess somebody who can use bugreporter might want to fill a
documentation bug, since the +new family should be mentioned along with
copy/mutableCopy/alloc in those memory policy documents? Perhaps with note
"not used in Foundation / AppKit"?
---
Ondra Cada
OCSoftware: email@hidden
http://www.ocs.cz
2K Development: email@hidden
http://www.2kdevelopment.cz
private email@hidden
http://www.ocs.cz/oc
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.