• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: C99 complience
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: C99 complience


  • Subject: Re: C99 complience
  • From: Rosyna <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 05:54:02 -0700

I am not aware of any C99 features that are supported by gcc 2.95. Some say GCC 3.0 is supposed to be a magic bullet that brings C99 compliance, and optimized compiles for the PowerPC chip.

Ack, at 2/13/02, Wade Tregaskis said:

I randomly stumbled across a C99 compliance failing by trying to do "for(int x = y;...)". Am I correct in assuming that I should be able to declare variables for the first time in for loops in this way [under C99], and that OS X's default version of [g]cc doesn't support this?

What other C99 features are currently unsupported, out of curiosity?

--



Sincerely,
Rosyna Keller
Technical Support/Holy Knight/Always needs a hug

Unsanity: Unsane Tools for Insane People
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: C99 complience
      • From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>
References: 
 >C99 complience (From: Wade Tregaskis <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: C99 complience
  • Next by Date: Re: Strings
  • Previous by thread: Re: C99 complience
  • Next by thread: Re: C99 complience
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread