• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How viable is Cocoa development?


  • Subject: Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
  • From: "John C. Randolph" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 15:23:27 -0800

On Friday, January 25, 2002, at 03:09 PM, Finlay Dobbie wrote:


On Friday, January 25, 2002, at 10:55 PM, John C. Randolph wrote:

Troll or not, in the context it is, I guess, quite right: whilst almost
complete Cocoa (but some news like sheets or drawers) is
totally portable to
anywhere GNUStep is available, *NO* Carbon-specific service is
available
outside of Mac.

AFAIK, the GNUStep folks haven't tried yet to implement the
window-morphing that we do for the sheets.

As Ondra said... Even so, when (if?) GNUstep ports the sheets API, who says they have to make them squoosh out in such a silly way? I mean, I'd be perfectly happy if Apple spent more time fixing bugs than implementing all their window squooshing effects.

The window morphing effect was *done* by the time that Steve first demonstrated it. We don't have a bunch of people re-implementing it every month.

-jcr

John C. Randolph <email@hidden> (408) 974-8819
Sr. Software Engineer, Cocoa Evangelism
Apple Worldwide Developer Relations


References: 
 >Re: How viable is Cocoa development? (From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
  • Next by Date: Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
  • Previous by thread: Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
  • Next by thread: Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread