• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How viable is Cocoa development?


  • Subject: Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
  • From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 23:43:02 +0000

On Friday, January 25, 2002, at 11:42 PM, Erik M. Buck wrote:

From Apple's own documentation, Carbon includes the following: (Which have
Cocoa wrappers ? )

What documentation are you referring to?

Screen savers
Preference panes

These 2 are definitely not Carbon, they are Obj-C and are implemented in Cocoa. They are documented under "Additional Technologies" or something, and not Carbon.

All system services that are available to all application environments

Aren't these, by definition, "Core Services", and not "Carbon"? :-P

I personally would have thought of Carbon as being everything in CarbonCore.framework and Carbon.framework, but then, hey, whatever.

And I don't see how you can call Quartz Carbon... Is xnu Carbon too?

-- Finlay


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
      • From: "Erik M. Buck" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: How viable is Cocoa development? (From: "Erik M. Buck" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
  • Next by Date: Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
  • Previous by thread: Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
  • Next by thread: Re: How viable is Cocoa development?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread