• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: How ATTRACTIVE is CoCoa development?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How ATTRACTIVE is CoCoa development?


  • Subject: Re: How ATTRACTIVE is CoCoa development?
  • From: Bob Savage <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 21:04:03 -0600

on 1/27/02 4:15 PM, Erik M. Buck wrote:
> The educational institutions already have Windows PCs and Openstep
> Enterprise 4.2 worked fine on them. You could have the development tools
> and Windows at the same time. If a school wants to use Cocoa now, they must
> spend a minimum of $899 for Mac hardware to run it instead of $99 to run
> the Openstep development tools on the Windows machine they already have.

Every school I have been at since 1989 has had a Mac lab. EVERY one of them.
Education is considered the one market segment (outside of the arts) where
Apple is considered a market leader. So we deduct the $899 (actually $749 at
the education price) for the iMac they already have, and MacOSX came with
it, so we have free versus a hundred bucks.

It still looks to me like Apple is actively courting the educational
developer.

Bob


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: How ATTRACTIVE is CoCoa development?
      • From: "Erik M. Buck" <email@hidden>
    • Re: How ATTRACTIVE is CoCoa development?
      • From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: How ATTRACTIVE is CoCoa development? (From: "Erik M. Buck" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: NSTextFields and undo
  • Next by Date: Re: Setting desktop background from application
  • Previous by thread: Re: How ATTRACTIVE is CoCoa development?
  • Next by thread: Re: How ATTRACTIVE is CoCoa development?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread