• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
[LONG] Making the right choice (was Re: How viable is Cocoa development?)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[LONG] Making the right choice (was Re: How viable is Cocoa development?)


  • Subject: [LONG] Making the right choice (was Re: How viable is Cocoa development?)
  • From: Bruno Blondeau <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 01:55:57 +0100

on 28/01/02 1:36, email@hidden -
email@hidden wrote:

> Am Sonntag den, 27. Januar 2002, um 12:55, schrieb Finlay Dobbie:
>
>> On Sunday, January 27, 2002, at 11:44 AM, Stefan Jung wrote:
>>
>>> Mixing binaries...I don't no if there are traps with mixing CFM and
>>> Mach-o code.
>>
>> Omni seems to manage OK, and Carbon can be Mach-O.
> I am not up to date with CodeWarrior. Can the latest 7.2 version
> generate Mach-O?

Yes, it can generate Mach-O applications.

Not only can it generate Mach-O Carbon applications, but it can also
generate Cocoa application.

By the way, the compiler seems very good compared to GCC (both in term of
compile speed and quality of the code generated).

It can even handle Objective-C++ code.

Cocoa developers really should try to compile their applications with
CodeWarrior to see if this couldn't lead to an effort-free speed
improvement.

This should be especially true for Apple, by the way :-)


Bruno Blondeau


  • Prev by Date: Re: AppleEvents, CGIs, Cocoa
  • Next by Date: NIB / menu question
  • Previous by thread: Re: Keychain Manager
  • Next by thread: NIB / menu question
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread