Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?
Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?
- Subject: Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?
- From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 00:50:15 +0200
On Wednesday, July 3, 2002, at 12:31 , Cameron Hayne wrote:
Therefore, if a filesystem wants to work under it, *IT* has to support
what's needed -- not by dirty tricks like the special names, but by a
way which can be reconciled with the *STANDARD* techniques of BSD, posix,
shell scripts, OpenStep, whatever. If it does not, it's its fault -- in
this case, the blame is on the side of HFS+
From the point of view of the Macintosh community, HFS+ came before Cocoa
(it is irrelevant what the chronology was on some other systems), and
hence Cocoa needs to be compatible with HFS+.
What the "Macintosh community" of yours seems to be continually missing is
that with OSX (luckily!) they no more live in their propriatery closed
niche, but became (at last!) part of the big world.
---
Ondra Cada
OCSoftware: email@hidden
http://www.ocs.cz
private email@hidden
http://www.ocs.cz/oc
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.