• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?


  • Subject: Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?
  • From: G Douglas Davidson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 14:08:49 -0400

On Wednesday, July 3, 2002, at 01:55 PM, Cameron Hayne wrote:

On Wednesday, July 3, 2002, at 01:00 pm, G Douglas Davidson wrote:

Well, I've noticed that UFS seems to be considerably slower than HFS+.

It must be all that case-sensitive comparison that slows it down. :^)
Seriously though, what might be the reason for the speed difference? I would have expected UFS to be more-or-less a direct copy of the BSD filesystem and I haven't heard of speed problems on straight BSD systems.

Well, that is the question. Apparently it is a fairly old version of UFS (no soft updates). Also, I noticed I can't create files > 4 GB in size. Also, there is the database file system issue where HFS+ can grab directory structure info from a database rather than traversing the file system. The bottom line is that I have yet to find any situation where UFS is faster than HFS+. In any sort of file searching situation, HFS+ is just so much faster its silly.

My only concerns with HFS+ are the case issue, the potential lack of performance in a multiprocessing situation where the file system gets requests from many difference processes/threads, and the potential for corruption without a journeling / soft updates scheme--it is possible to avoid "fscks" (or their equivalents) for most versions of Unix these days (IRIX, Linux, BSD (at least is goes on in the background after your back up)).

I hate to beat this into the ground and I'll stop, but it is really the only outstanding issue for me where we would adopt OS X in a wider fashion (beyond desktops.) If they addressed this and ECC memory support, well, I'd be so happy I'm not sure what I'd do.


--
G Douglas Davidson | CityNet, Inc.
email@hidden | Pittsburgh, PA
voice: 412.481.5406 | fax: 412.431.1315
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?
      • From: Isaac Sherman <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix? (From: Cameron Hayne <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?
  • Next by Date: Re: extracting html from text file
  • Previous by thread: Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?
  • Next by thread: Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread