Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?
Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?
- Subject: Re: Cocoa stripping resource forks: does Jaguar fix?
- From: Ondra Cada <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 19:17:32 +0200
On Thursday, July 4, 2002, at 06:47 , Dan Crevier wrote:
Or any other known one (rtfd, eg.). Well, the very existence of the
bundle
bit is another Mac OS X bug: the packages should be recognized by their
suffixes only, as it always was in NeXTStep -- for the very reson you
pointed out: it's portable.
Do you know if there's a list around? Is there a way to add one of my
extensions to this list?
Yeah -- just make an application which uses this suffix for its data files.
I disagree it's an unimportant trifle. It is data loss, and users will be
confused if their documents suddenly become folders.
Well, that's why I advocate using suffixes instead of the bundle bit: then
it would not happen in any circumstances.
---
Ondra Cada
OCSoftware: email@hidden
http://www.ocs.cz
private email@hidden
http://www.ocs.cz/oc
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.