• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Serial number verification / obfuscation (was: Re: Hiding [...] symbols [...])
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Serial number verification / obfuscation (was: Re: Hiding [...] symbols [...])


  • Subject: Re: Serial number verification / obfuscation (was: Re: Hiding [...] symbols [...])
  • From: Allan Odgaard <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 01:05:03 +0200

On sxndag, juli 28, 2002, at 12:20 , David Remahl wrote:

It would be very interesting if you'd write a summary of your
observations! [...]
An essay on the topic would probably be appreciated by many. Software
developers and crackers alike...Many programs are so open that just about
anyone could crack them, which would probably harm shareware developers to
some extent.

OTOH security through secrecy doesn't seem to work, Microsoft has demonstrated that all to well :-) However I realize that only by using cryptographically strong methods will it really be possible to openly reveal how one implements security, and that may not be a step that many shareware developers wish to take, simply due to the lack of knowledge in that field.

Industrial strength signatures are difficult to step around. But still a
crack is pretty simple to make in those cases...

But a cracked program suck for the user if it's frequently updated, cause then he'll have to find a new crack. So for me cracks are of minor importance -- not to mention that crackers might get it wrong and so cracked programs are never really trusted 100% (i.e. they may crash etc.).

I will think about sharing some of my experiences. If anyone has any input,
please send it to me privately, since this is on the borderline of the topic
of this mailing list.

What's interesting for me is weather or not those "cracked" serial numbers actually belong to somebody who doesn't mind giving them away (or perhaps it was "stolen" in someway), or if they are simply obtained by re-engineering the program?

Surely there must be some shareware authors on this list who've found a fake serial to their program, did it belong to a registered user? and if so, what action did you take?
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Serial number verification / obfuscation (was: Re: Hiding [...] symbols [...])
      • From: David Remahl <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Serial number verification / obfuscation (was: Re: Hiding [...] symbols [...]) (From: David Remahl <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: NSDateFormatter problem with %p
  • Next by Date: Re: NSMovieView: RTSP streams won't buffer?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Serial number verification / obfuscation (was: Re: Hiding [...] symbols [...])
  • Next by thread: Re: Serial number verification / obfuscation (was: Re: Hiding [...] symbols [...])
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread