• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: protecting software & uniquely identifying the machine
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: protecting software & uniquely identifying the machine


  • Subject: Re: protecting software & uniquely identifying the machine
  • From: Joe Morris <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 10:32:48 -0700 (PDT)

Well yeah, that's the other thing - in the near future at least I'll be lucky to release one shareware application, and setting up some sort of internet license system for that is WAY overkill, IMHO. :-)

-Joe

On Tuesday, 18, 2002, at 09:00AM, Chris Ridd <email@hidden> wrote:

>Joe Morris <email@hidden> wrote:
>> I believe this is a good idea and would also get around the brought up
>> problems of restricting a user to a certain username. For those of you
>> who are saying that you should be allowed to install it on multiple
>> machines, that is true, but allowing that for free makes it impossible to
>> prevent arbitrary distribution of the same ability to anyone over the
>> internet. For those of you who say that adding some sort of user
>> identification won't stop piracy: of course it won't. The only hope is
>> to slow it or to stop casual piracy.
>
>Well there's also the idea of having floating licenses obtained from a
>network daemon - allowing 'n' copies of the program to run at the same time
>on a network.
>
>Someone earlier suggested a commercial licensing package from
>www.stone.com. A very common licensing package for other Unixes and even
>Windows is also available for OS X - FlexLM from www.globetrotter.com. It
>is very easy to use, pretty robust (it avoids most of the problems noted in
>this thread) and it basically does enough to discourage the less than
>determined pirate.
>
>It will also probably be complete overkill for many apps...
>
>Cheers,
>
>Chris
>_______________________________________________
>cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
>Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
>Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Prev by Date: Re: Getting a list of installed applications
  • Next by Date: Re: [Q] Help system
  • Previous by thread: Re: protecting software & uniquely identifying the machine
  • Next by thread: Signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread