• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Quartz/memory benchmarks...
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Quartz/memory benchmarks...


  • Subject: Re: Quartz/memory benchmarks...
  • From: Gérard Iglesias <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 23:58:29 +0200

On Thursday, June 27, 2002, at 10:42 PM, Allan Odgaard wrote:

On torsdag, juni 27, 2002, at 05:32 , Kyle Hammond wrote:

I've found this thread to be fairly interesting, but am not seeing any of the slowness that has been talked about.

I should probably have provided some benchmarking code that people could check for themselves -- but the project in which my benchmarking evolved did a lot of other stuff, and it wasn't easy to isolate...

Well, all this thing is a bit frustrating for sure, it is obvious that for now Cocoa/Quartz doesn't scale well, look at the slowness of the tree view of the files hierarchy in PBX.

But I don't think that saying some strong sentence against the Apple developers is justified.

Carbon/Cocoa/Quartz/OpenGL/Quicktime integration is a very ambitious project and need to mature.

I like so much looking at Quicktime playing under a transparent window like the menu, it is too funny.

I think that the guys at Apple use PBX every day and they know that there is need to improvement.

There has been obvious progress in this area since 1 year and I hope that Jaguar will bring more progress.

I think that we know that making kind of work is hard and need time to be done.

Regards

Girard
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: Quartz/memory benchmarks... (From: Allan Odgaard <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: What's STILL wrong with "symbol" fonts?
  • Next by Date: Re: Quartz/memory benchmarks...
  • Previous by thread: Re: Quartz/memory benchmarks...
  • Next by thread: Re: Quartz/memory benchmarks...
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread