• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Bug in g++'s int constructor?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Bug in g++'s int constructor?


  • Subject: Bug in g++'s int constructor?
  • From: Mark <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 17:42:37 -0500

Hi everyone,

Please excuse me if this is off topic for this list, I really didn't
know where else to post it, aside for maybe darwin-dev or whatnot.
I believe I have inadvertently discovered a bug in g++. ( 2.95 I
believe, stock OS 10.1.3 with most recent dev tools installed )
The int constructor is only initializing an int to 0 in a member
function on the first run of that function. All calls to that function,
after the initial, get the SAME value that the int had when running the
member function the first time through.

i.e. this is what happened to me...
On the first run insert works perfectly, next time its called sum was
reallocated in the same spot with the same value every time. So the
program would hang, insert would never return true (ITEM was inserted)
because the sum of everything in the array + ITEM would ALWAYS be
greater then CAPACITY.

bool bag::insert( const int ITEM )
{
int sum;

for( x = 0; x <= ARRAY_INDEX; x++ )
{
sum += data[x];
}

if( (sum + ITEM) <= CAPACITY )
{
data[ ARRAY_INDEX ] = ITEM;
ARRAY_INDEX++;
return ( true );
}
else
return ( false );
}

Granted just changing int sum; to int sum = 0; fixes the problem, but
doesn't change the fact that this is a bug.
To the point, has anyone else discovered this? Filled a bug report?
Should I?

thanks for your time,
- Mark.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Bug in g++'s int constructor?
      • From: "Clark S. Cox III" <email@hidden>
    • Re: Bug in g++'s int constructor?
      • From: Phillip Morelock <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: idle waste
  • Next by Date: Re: cocoa-dev digest, Vol 2 #406 - 13 msgs
  • Previous by thread: Questions about NSBitmapImageRep
  • Next by thread: Re: Bug in g++'s int constructor?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread