• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Utility window architecture question
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Utility window architecture question


  • Subject: Re: Utility window architecture question
  • From: Steven Rogers <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 15:36:11 -0500

On Sunday, May 19, 2002, at 03:13 PM, Erik M. Buck wrote:

I advocate a blanket ban on all software patents.

Some software is reasonably patentable because it involves business, manufacturing, and engineering process, which is (and should be) patentable.

Software is a branch of mathematics and mathematics is not patentable.

Software is an application of mathematics, it is not a branch of mathematics. Engineering principles are not patentable, but the devices one creates *using* engineering principles are.

Software is already protected under copyright and trade secret law not to mention end user licenses.

We need protection for *real* intellectual property. Just banning patents altogether will not solve the problem.

SR
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: Utility window architecture question (From: "Erik M. Buck" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re(4): AltiVec optimization in Cocoa?
  • Next by Date: Re(2): Obj-C, class methods and instance methods
  • Previous by thread: Re: Utility window architecture question
  • Next by thread: Re: Utility window architecture question
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread