• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?


  • Subject: Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
  • From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 12:38:12 +0000

On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 07:55 pm, Jonathan Hendry wrote:

How about inside a bundle instead? (Yeah, I know, frameworks are bundles.
"Framework" connotes a larger degree of hassle to me, perhaps wrongly.)

Frameworks aren't bundles, in the sense that they are MH_DYLIB and not MH_BUNDLE. Confusingly, OS X has two different meanings of the word bundle, one as in the type of binary format, and one as in a directory full of files which go together (.app, .bundle, .plugin, .framework etc).

-- Finlay
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? (From: Jonathan Hendry <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Keeping a window of the Pasteboard
  • Next by Date: Re: Calling a unix command from Cocoa ?
  • Previous by thread: Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
  • Next by thread: Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread