• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?


  • Subject: Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
  • From: Finlay Dobbie <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 15:30:11 +0000

On Sunday, November 10, 2002, at 07:39 am, Rosyna wrote:

But uhm... frameworks are bundles, aren't they?

Depends what you mean by "bundle", but in the terminology Ondra was referring to, no, they're not. Frameworks are just dynamic library (.dylib) + headers, whereas bundles are dynamically loadable things, like plugins and so on (.so). See the Linker release notes, linker manpage, and /usr/include/mach-o/dyld.h for more info :-)

-- Finlay
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
      • From: Sam Griffith <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility? (From: Rosyna <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Using a subclass in IB
  • Next by Date: Re: cocoa-dev digest, Vol 2 #1500 - 17 msgs
  • Previous by thread: Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
  • Next by thread: Re: "weak link" framework refs for 10.1 compatibility?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread