• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: { Semi-Newbie } Inverse of +initialize?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: { Semi-Newbie } Inverse of +initialize?


  • Subject: Re: { Semi-Newbie } Inverse of +initialize?
  • From: David Remahl <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 00:36:01 +0200

> All this would do is make your app take longer to terminate. There's
> no point to freeing memory when the app is quitting.

IMHO, there is some idea in trying to make sure that all objects are
dealloced as they should when the application is terminating. Objects may do
other stuff than simply freeing memory when they are dealloced, for example
close down socket connections or remove temporary files. If they are
forcibly destroyed, then this junk will be left behind.

/ Rgds, David Remahl
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: { Semi-Newbie } Inverse of +initialize?
      • From: "John C. Randolph" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: { Semi-Newbie } Inverse of +initialize? (From: "John C. Randolph" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: { Semi-Newbie } Inverse of +initialize?
  • Next by Date: Seattle??? [was Re: Toronto cocoa programmers?]
  • Previous by thread: Re: { Semi-Newbie } Inverse of +initialize?
  • Next by thread: Re: { Semi-Newbie } Inverse of +initialize?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread