• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: CoreFoundation on Win32
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CoreFoundation on Win32


  • Subject: Re: CoreFoundation on Win32
  • From: Alex Perez <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:48:45 -0800 (PST)

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Andy Satori wrote:

> I'm familiar with GnuStep, but I don't find it a workable solution on
> Win32 because of it's dependancies on Cygwin and Ming/W. In addition,
> at this point Gorm and Project Center aren't up to enterprise
> development levels.
Well, Cygwin is a dependency, but it's also a single DLL for the purposes
of distribution. If you look at Mingw as a "dependency", yoU (seriously)
don't understand what Mingw is all about. Minge builds NATIVE MS C runtime
binaries, unlike Cygwin. it was specifically designed to eliminate cygwin
as a dependency. It's primarily a bunch of header files. Once your app is
compiled, there are *NO* dependencies. That's the whole point of Mingw32
>
> All of this is compounded by the fact that it takes a Unix person to
> install and use the environment on any of the supported platforms.
> That means that the run-time is beyond the scope of most Mac or Windows
> users. Until these problems are solved, GnuStep is not a viable
> solution.
There's a nifty windows installer proof-of-concept for GNUstep/win32,
which is a great way to demonstrate that the above statement is quite
misguided, at best.
>
> Not to be offensive, but I'm getting tired about hearing about GnuStep,
> as it's been around for at least 6 years, and still isn't up to a 1.0
> status, I'm not getting my hopes up.
*shrug* If you're myopic to the degree that you can't get over the fact
that a version number happens to not be greater than 1.0, you've got other
issues. I use GNUstep daily, and it's quite usable. Most of the people who
badmouth GNUstep haven't used it (A) at all or (B) recently. (within the
last 6 months to one year)
>
> Andy
>
> On Dec 17, 2003, at 1:05 PM, Alex Perez wrote:
>
> >> The other day I was doing something an XCode popped up with
> >> NSWindows95OperatingSystem in it's code completion. It took a minute
> >> to register and another day for the old OpenStep for Windows / Yellow
> >> Box projects to return to my conscious mind to grasp the
> >> insignificance. For a few hours there I was genuinely excited by the
> >> prospect of writing Windows code in Objective C. Then reality set in
> >> and it was back to the drudgery of MFC, ATL and the joy of
> >> Systems.Windows.Forms.
> > GNUstep allows you to write both ObjC tools and GUI Apps under
> > Microsoft
> > Windows. GNUstep's Foundation is quite stable under Windows. The
> > AppKit is
> > another story, however, but Fred Keifer is currently workin on fixing a
> > number of the issues that remain. The day will come, probably within a
> > year, where what YellowBox was will exist again in a different form,
> > written by different people, but it will effectively be the same. I
> > encourage *anyone* who is interested in porting ObjC GUI apps to Win32
> > to
> > help out with the GNUstep win32 backend. The more people who help out,
> > the
> > faster this will be a reality.
> >
> > Alex Perez
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: CoreFoundation on Win32 (From: Andy Satori <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Changing the Locale for a single App?
  • Next by Date: Re: sending mail
  • Previous by thread: Re: CoreFoundation on Win32
  • Next by thread: Bindings: Value With Pattern Question
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread