• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Frameworks
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Frameworks


  • Subject: Frameworks
  • From: Karl Goiser <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:45:17 +1100

Hello and Seasons Greetings to all!

In advance: sorry if this is a dumb question!


I have an application that runs substantially the same as an application or screen saver.

Something that that has interested me is the fact that, while the app is around 600k in size, the screen saver is just over 200k - for not that much less code/data.

However, the application uses the Carbon framework which sits in the "linked frameworks" group and is regarded as a "wrapper.framework" by Xcode. Could this 400k difference in size be explained by the inclusion of the Carbon library in the application?

Does this mean that Cocoa's AppKit and Foundation frameworks are also included in the products?

Does this mean that some of the frameworks should be linked weakly?


Just wondering...


Thanks in advance!

Karl
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Prev by Date: Re: Reading return values from NSTask
  • Next by Date: Re: Making a delegate NSResponder
  • Previous by thread: Re: Weird behavior when setting the size of a window used as a sheet
  • Next by thread: Re: cocoa-dev digest, Vol 2 #3404 - 14 msgs
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread