• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: bug in AddressBook Framework headers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bug in AddressBook Framework headers


  • Subject: Re: bug in AddressBook Framework headers
  • From: Karl Kuehn <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:09:31 -0500

Unless I am missing something, this makes it impossible to determine the difference between the two cases. Right now my program can see the differences in all of the other cases, but I see all of the instant messaging cases as either being kABAIMHomeLabel or kABAIMWorkLabel. If you know something I am missing, please tell me.

Karl Kuehn
email@hidden

PS.. all of the kAB labels (the pre-defined ones... not custom ones) look like this "_?!!?_"... but are distinguishable strings (they differ in non-printable ways).

On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 11:31 AM, Vince DeMarco wrote:

int main (int argc, const char * argv[]) {
if ([kABMSNHomeLabel compare:kABICQHomeLabel] == NSOrderedSame) {
printf("this is a problem\n");
}
}

Why do you consider this a problem??? its just an implementation detail that the two strings are actually the samething.

vince
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: bug in AddressBook Framework headers
      • From: Henri Lamiraux <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: bug in AddressBook Framework headers (From: Vince DeMarco <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Protecting singleton objects from releasing
  • Next by Date: Re: Shared Memory and Distributed Objects
  • Previous by thread: Re: bug in AddressBook Framework headers
  • Next by thread: Re: bug in AddressBook Framework headers
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread