Re: A legitimate argument for calling dealloc directly?
Re: A legitimate argument for calling dealloc directly?
- Subject: Re: A legitimate argument for calling dealloc directly?
- From: Andrew Thompson <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:26:48 -0500
On Tuesday, Jan 14, 2003, at 22:25 America/New_York, Daniel Jalkut
wrote:
I wasn't aware of these "method forwarding" facilities. It does in
fact look like this might accomplish what I was originally thinking
of. Still feels a little weird, so I might try to avoid it, but
thank you for pointing this out!
Well, its what most languages would call automatic support for
delegation. Rather than having to forward methods to the enclosed type
manually, on a method-by-method basis, the runtime does it for you.
There are many proposals for adding such a capability to Java. One
might say its an example of how Objective-C excels.
AndyT (lordpixel - the cat who walks through walls)
A little bigger on the inside
(see you later space cowboy ...)
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.