Re: COM/DCOM and Objective-/Cocoa legacy
Re: COM/DCOM and Objective-/Cocoa legacy
- Subject: Re: COM/DCOM and Objective-/Cocoa legacy
- From: Andy Satori <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 10:26:12 -0500
Agreed one hundred percent, but as far as I can tell, the current
implementation doesn't pass parameters correctly to SOAP calls on the MS.NET
WebService. I'm still researching, but it's been less than successful.
Andy
On 1/17/03 11:49 PM, "Jonathan Hendry" <email@hidden> pounded the
keyboard to produce:
>
On Wednesday, Jan 15, 2003, at 15:54 America/New_York, Jeff Szuhay
>
wrote:
>
>
> At 12:41 PM -0500 1/15/03, Michelle L. Buck wrote:
>
>> NeXT used to sell a product ...
>
>> .... If you want these features/technologies updated and supported,
>
>> tell Apple.
>
>
>
> Sorry to be cynical here, but there are a lot of people on this list
>
> and
>
> others that have requested other critical technologies from NeXT but
>
> have gone unheard/unsatisfied. Objective-C EOF is the first that comes
>
> to mind. NetGrazer is another.
>
>
NetGrazer? Never heard of it. (NeXT user since 1992). You don't
>
mean NewsGrazer, Jayson Adams' Usenet app? That wasn't
>
an Apple thing.
>
>
>
Anyway, as far as PDO is concerned, I would think that
>
in this day and age, it might be better to go with an
>
XML-RPC or SOAP implementation. Much less overhead,
>
no need for the pseudo-Mach messaging layer. Possibly
>
more secure, and you'd be less likely to have firewall
>
issues. Lots of tools and code available, on a variety
>
of platforms and languages, including Microsoft's own.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.