• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
[OT}Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[OT}Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt.


  • Subject: [OT}Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt.
  • From: zauhar <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:56:01 -0400

On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 09:29 AM, publiclook wrote:

When I started this post, I was hoping for a discussion of the relative development styles and advantages for Qt vs. Cocoa given that some people seemed willing to use exotic pre-processors, forego an IDE completely, and program in C++ in PREFERENCE to using Cocoa even on the Mac. I am trying to understand what it is about Cocoa that makes it less approachable (for some) than Qt. In my limited experience with Qt, it seems very unapproachable to me.

The key word in the original article is "used", as in "I am used to C++", "I am used to Visual Basic".

These can be amplified as "... but I'm SO used to Visual C++ ...", ad nauseum.

The word "used" can sometimes be a sign of mental laziness, and in computing it often represents a lack of initiative to learn anything that is too far removed from prior experience. To a certain extent I can understand the attitude - from the way the author of the article in question describes himself I suspect he does not have a lot of experience, and is probably happy to generate GUIs that have a few buttons. I suspect he is basically playing around.

I would suggest that most of the people on this list are trying to do things miles above what that fellow is attempting, and are probably much more sophisticated in outlook than even most commercial developers. Most developers see their work as a job, not a calling or a craft, and mainly want to get the job done quickly and with little concern for aesthetics. In short they have little emotional investment in their work, and I sense that most on this list have a very different attitude, and should not waste a lot of time analyzing that guy's psychology.

(All that said, I do understand the desire for cross-platform development, at least for Linux, and I am hoping that GNUStep will fill the bill...)

I'm shutting up right now!

Randy

Randy J. Zauhar, PhD
Assoc. Prof. of Biochemistry
Director, Graduate Program in Bioinformatics
Dept. of Chemistry & Biochemistry
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia
600 S. 43rd Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Phone: (215)596-8691
FAX: (215)596-8543
E-mail: email@hidden
Web: http://tonga.usip.edu/zauhar


Discussion after watching Disney's "Lilo & Stitch":

DAD: "But why did the space aliens speak English, as opposed to French, or Swahili? And why did the one alien speak English with an Eastern European accent? I don't get it."

CATHERINE (age 7): "That's 'cause you don't have a good cartoon brain."
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt. (From: publiclook <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: changing the text in an NSTextField
  • Next by Date: Re: changing the text in an NSTextField
  • Previous by thread: Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt.
  • Next by thread: Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt.
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread