Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt.
Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt.
- Subject: Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt.
- From: Marco Scheurer <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 18:39:09 +0200
On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 05:58 PM, Rich Warren wrote:
I disagree with most of your points about dynamic vs static, and
private/public, but it is just a matter of differing opinions. However
the following statement is false:
Similarly, while I think it's cool and potentially very useful that
(as I
understand it) in Objective C you can send any message to any object.
If the
object doesn't have a matching method, it just ignores the message.
A "does not respond to selector" exception is raised. Now it can be
catched or not, but at least while debugging you should always break on
all exceptions.
Marco Scheurer
Sen:te, Lausanne, Switzerland
http://www.sente.ch
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.