• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt.


  • Subject: Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt.
  • From: Christopher Henrich <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 23:35:34 -0400

On Monday, June 30, 2003, at 10:30 PM, publiclook wrote:

Al of the following are my opinions and worries as a long established developer:

There is an article about using Qt on Mac OS X in preference to using Cocoa.
http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=3929.

I certainly understand the desirability of a good cross-platform framework. Mac OS X is now the fifth platform on which I have used Foundation and Appkit. What I don't understand is comments like the following:

Wow. I didn't know that foundation and AppKit crossed that many platforms. Neat. Now...
can we have them on MS windows?

"I tried to un-brainwash myself from years of Windows programming in order to accept Objective-C and Cocoa. But as soon as I heard that Trolltech was going to release an updated Qt library for MacOSX, I abandoned Cocoa altogether. "

<Clunking sound of my eyebrows hitting the ceiling/>
Well, it just goes to show... different people do think differently.


"My own experience is that it's very hard to unlearn C/C++ and adapt to the mentality and style of Objective-C. I've read comments from other developers in OSX forums who feel the same way."
Really? I found it perilously easy to get into Objective C. Will I be able to face the challenge, the sense of mystery, the sheer undecidableness of C++ again? Only time will tell.

The author was even willing to forego any sort of IDE in order to stick with Qt. In other words, doing without an IDE was less of an impediment than using Cocoa.
Well, I belong to the Club Of Old Farts Who Can Actually Remember Punched Cards. But I do NOT belong to the elite inner circle who feel nostalgic about punched cards. Doing without an IDE is halfway back to punched cards. Let's not go there; but if "the author" wants to, well, he is at his own mercy...

Chris Henrich
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Prev by Date: Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt.
  • Next by Date: Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt.
  • Previous by thread: Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt.
  • Next by thread: Re: Strong language about Cocoa and Qt.
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread