Re: Subclass
Re: Subclass
- Subject: Re: Subclass
- From: Dustin Voss <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 12:32:32 -0700
On Saturday, June 14, 2003, at 05:01 PM, Chris Hanson wrote:
On Saturday, June 14, 2003, at 03:22 AM, Sailor Quasar wrote:
2. The ability to declare methods protected or private
These are nonsensical in a true object-oriented language; since you
can send any message to any object at any time, there is and can be no
enforcement of protection.
Why ever would you think that a "true" OO language should not -- and
*can* not -- have protected/private methods? Smalltalk is not the
end-all and be-all, you know.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
| References: | |
| | >Re: Subclass (From: Chris Hanson <email@hidden>) |