• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: How dangerous is +load?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How dangerous is +load?


  • Subject: Re: How dangerous is +load?
  • From: Georg Tuparev <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 07:11:26 +0200

On Thursday, May 1, 2003, at 02:55 Europe/Amsterdam, Daniel Zitter wrote:

Georg wrote:
But I really do not want to create any
dependancies between the class in question and NSApp or its delegate.

I am confused by this requirement. One line of initialization code in the app or app delegate class is a small dependancy. Could you elaborate on the motivation for this requirement? Can we not assume you have the ability to recompile the application(s) you wish to test?

What if the class of interest is a part of a plugin, and the original author of NSApp's delegate have no idea about the existence of this plugin? But even if this is not the case, one line of dependancy is one line too much.

Georg Tuparev
Tuparev Technologies
Klipper 13
1186 VR Amstelveen
The Netherlands
Mobile: +31-6-55798196
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: How dangerous is +load?
      • From: Marcel Weiher <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: NSImage PDF support
  • Next by Date: Re: NSImage PDF support
  • Previous by thread: Re: NSImage PDF support
  • Next by thread: Re: How dangerous is +load?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread