Re: Objective-C Question
Re: Objective-C Question
- Subject: Re: Objective-C Question
- From: Roy Lovejoy <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:42:22 -0700
On Monday, September 22, 2003, at 08:26 AM, email@hidden wrote:
On Monday, September 22, 2003, at 03:56 AM, Steve Ehrenfried wrote:
2) Being to able to have a partial implementation of a
class, i.e. an "abstract class".
This "feature" provides no value. Why don't you just call the class
"AbstractWhatever" - that communicates the idea just as weel.
<stuff deleted>
Go learn a few more languages. Then maybe your critiques will be
worth something.
I'm probably not the only one who sees the irony in these two
statements. :)
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.