• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: CamelBones
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CamelBones


  • Subject: Re: CamelBones
  • From: "Jonathan 'Wolf' Rentzsch" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:55:38 -0500

James Stroud, email@hidden, wrote:
>I do have many
>classes in Python that I have written that I would love to put a GUI
>around and make an application out of--and be able to distribute to my
>peers without their having to install anything beyond my program. The
>PyObjC documentation is a bit evasive on this topic (or I am missing
>something?).

Yes. There are three ways to package a PyObjC .app:

1. Non-standalone. Your .app is dependent on PyObjC already have been
installed.
2. Semi-standalone. The PyObjC bridge and frameworks you require are
copied into the app. While dependant on the system python install, no
PyObjC install needed.
3. Fully standalone. This one actually bundles the python binary into
your .app if I recall correctly. No PyObjC install needed.

This is off the top of my head, no research, so it's probably slightly
wrong.

| Jonathan 'Wolf' Rentzsch http://rentzsch.com
| Red Shed Software http://redshed.net
| "better" necessarily means "different"
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


  • Prev by Date: Linking problem
  • Next by Date: Re: CamelBones
  • Previous by thread: Re: CamelBones
  • Next by thread: setHidden: on MacOS 10.2
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread