Re: [OT] Encryption
Re: [OT] Encryption
- Subject: Re: [OT] Encryption
- From: Howard Oakley <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 23:21:14 +0000
On 2/1/04 10:23 pm, Alex Perez wrote:
>
The sueer IDIOCY of this thread flooding my Inbox with completely useless,
>
mindless drivel is beginning to get on my nerves. Will the three of you
>
please take this pissing contest off-list? This has gone on far too long
>
already, and I ask that you respect the other subscribers of this list and
>
Do The Right Thing.
With the greatest respect, Alex, whilst I think that some of the exchanges
could be performed better by off-list email between those participating, and
some of the ad hominems could be avoided, there are very serious issues at
stake here. Whilst you and I (and many others) may have drawn our own
conclusions, they are necessarily subjective and personal. However there is
one crucial matter to which Robert has to attend, for on 1 Jan 2004, at
23:00, Robert Tito wrote:
>
It takes a
>
mere 15-20 minutes to crack any single 128 bits engine so I think you
>
have
>
either NO knowledge about encryption and or forensic research.
[snip]
>
128 bits is cracked in no time at all.
If Robert delivers the goods, then this is far from useless. I would prefer
to allow him the remainder of his holiday, after all 20 minutes or even a
few days is hardly material. Indeed, on 2/1/04 9:53 pm, Robert Tito wrote:
>
When I am at the office, no prob
>
Tuesday jan 6th you are nr 1
But if he fails to decrypt the example provided by Tuesday night, he will
clearly need to make a public retraction and apology to all concerned.
Even as an amateur, I am enthralled.
Happy New Year,
Howard.
Dr Howard Oakley
EHN & DIJ Oakley
Isle of Wight, UK
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.