Re: Encryption
Re: Encryption
- Subject: Re: Encryption
- From: Robert Tito <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 21:20:46 +0100
Hi Andy,
Since we deliver security solutions we do not aim to crack systems, but once
setting this rig up it is simple to go out and do the "nasty work"
So now we are merely composing the components to get the right tune played,
once tuned ok its simple for any other tricks. That was my point.
Transaction based security works neat no problem there, only the longer the
transmission the larger the chance to get caught and cracked.
It is much like VPN many think thats safe, well not really either
VPN in combination with encryption and decryption is yes but when using
videoconferencing the (de)coding should be handled in hardware else the
speed would diminish and thus rendering the conferencing to a mere changing
of still images.
regards
On 7-1-2004 20:58, "Andy Satori" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
While I admit to a fascination with this, I want to make a comment that
>
may seem to not matter.
>
>
If it's this much work to decrypt, then it's what I would consider
>
'reasonable' encryption, which IIRC, was the original question :-)
>
>
Andy
>
>
On Jan 7, 2004, at 2:34 PM, Shawn Erickson wrote:
>
>
> Yes, I did see your message outlining Salutis.
>
>
>
> I was simply informing the list that I sent a secondary encrypted
>
> message to you on the 6th of January (as outliined on
>
> http://homepage.mac.com/shawnce/misc/aesattack/). So that the prior
>
> encrypted message that I sent on January 2nd will likely be ignored /
>
> forgotten.
>
>
>
> Again lets keep this off the cocoa dev list, at least, until you have
>
> completed your work of pulling the message out of my encrypted message
>
> (the new one, sent on the 6th) and then only to let those on the list
>
> know of how the cracking went.
>
>
>
> -Shawn
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 7, 2004, at 10:47 AM, Robert Tito wrote:
>
>
>
>> Hi Shawn
>
>>
>
>> I did answer
>
>> (more then once too)
>
>>
>
>> I received those messages back from the group
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> On 7-1-2004 19:00, "Shawn Erickson" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>>
>
>>> On Jan 7, 2004, at 4:22 AM, Tobias Bayer wrote:
>
>>>
>
>>>> Am 03.01.2004 um 14:49 schrieb Nat!:
>
>>>>>
>
>>>>> I'd suggest lets suspend the thread till tuesday, when the result
>
>>>>> comes in.
>
>>>>
>
>>>> I'm wondering why the result has not yet come in...
>
>>>
>
>>> I am not sure Robert wanted to bother with my prior message so I
>
>>> sent a
>
>>> new one (see web page referenced below). Anyway lets keep this off of
>
>>> the cocoa dev list.
>
>>>
>
>>> I setup a simple web page at
>
>>> http://homepage.mac.com/shawnce/misc/aesattack/ about this and the
>
>>> current status of things.
>
>>>
>
>>> Email me if you have questions.
>
>>>
>
>>> -Shawn
>
>>> _______________________________________________
>
>>> cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
>
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
>
>>> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
>
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>
>>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> Rob Tito
>
>> email@hidden
>
>> email@hidden
>
>> ++31 - (0)621 824722
>
>> "The changes we wish to see need to come from within us"
>
>> M. Gandhi
>
>> Freedom is not worth having if it doesn't include the freedom to make
>
>> mistakes
>
>> M. Ghandi
>
>> Friends are dear, cherish them
>
>> R.P. Tito
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
>
> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
>
> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
>
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
cocoa-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/cocoa-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.